top of page

Why Do Jews & Whites On The Right Hate Black People So Much?

  • Writer: Christon
    Christon
  • Oct 11
  • 6 min read

Updated: Oct 24


Kash Patel was wholly unqualified to actually perform competently the job for which he was hired to do. Or Was He? Seems Patel really can't stand those mostly (thou I'm sure he's certain there must be some good among us) thugs and violent criminals. Which in his mind make up predominantly only one group: UC Kash Patel simply can't seem to help himself and even pretend or deny anymore the fact he desperately just really can't stomach black people.


It is a very obvious extension of his own profound deeply rooted self-loathing.


Often mistaken for black himself (or worse) was he resoundingly rejected generally by the most excellent black community and in particular, black women (both beautiful and plain find him, 'unfortunate looking' giving them what the kids I guess derisively call 'The Ick'), at a very early formative era in his life? The what appear to be more and more apparent scars are getting harder and harder to hide.


Or perhaps it's only because he no longer attempts or bothers to disguise his contempt, for black men, in particular, his very clearly naturally born, much taller, better looking, hell who are we kidding just all around Better than he'll ever have, black men, so infinitely much more so very much more and better than he can ever possibly hope even dream to be: Black Men.


A short dark little ugly hatefully angry putz like him, abusing his position of power. Gee, I'd say that's original but that would be of me just down & darn right uninspired. But I digress...


So profound his hate for dark skinned people goes, he apparently despises not just the blacks themselves, at this hateful, what is proving to be lil evil encel elf dark Nazi stage of his life, but anyone at all who shows even the slightest empathy for them or their well deserved suffering.


Even when we're murdered in cold blood, on camera in front of an entire neighborhood of powerless people who did nothing but watch.


His decision to dismiss several FBI agents who participated in kneeling at the George Floyd memorial has become a focal point for discussions about police immunity to kill innocent people, systemic racism, fascism, due process, overreach, social justice, and the rights of military veterans.



They've buried this already. You're reading about an incident seriously mysteriously faded away disappeared from the news cycle. They never even bothered to mention almost everyone of the vets he fired, was also black. Oops! They didn't do anything wrong: So Why Mention They Were Black? I mean, when does the media ever do that anyway, right? Mention they were black, that is.


They spent more time laughing about, with a wink while they disgracefully talked about, openly circulating the fake picture no doubt, of Kamala at P-Diddy's freaky (no peeky) soiree.


As with everything happening in our society right now, this is not just about one controversial action; it reflects deeper more profoundly disturbing issues facing our society right now, N Real Time.


Background on the Incident

The kneeling by FBI agents at the George Floyd memorial was more than a symbolic gesture. It aimed to honor Floyd's memory and support the international movement against racial injustice that gained momentum after his death in May 2020. According to a Pew Research survey conducted in June 2020, around 55% of Americans supported the Black Lives Matter movement, indicating a growing recognition of systemic racism and a call for change.


Nevertheless, Patel’s response to this act was swift. He characterized the kneeling as inappropriate for federal agents, arguing that it compromised the neutrality expected from law enforcement. This viewpoint has drawn both support and heavy criticism, highlighting a nation intentional divided on the roles that officers should play in social justice matters.


But more than this, it a serious commentary on the tolerance of white people for the suffering of blacks. If this had been an arrogant Black Man, who coifed his hair for the camera as we all watched the light dim before slowly going out entirely, for the last time in George Floyd's eyes...If David had been Tyrone and George next time is Josh or Tyler, what will white people then do?


Will you clutch your imaginary pearls then too, like you always do when they savagely beat another living human being again on the screen right in front of you watching until that once living human being ceases to Xist at all. Will you feign outrage then, one more time, like the last time, until the next time when another black man is brutally beaten to death, by one of our nations finest, another who seems to have forgotten their job is To Serve & Protect.


People seem to have forgotten the ending of the rhyme. Because what used to be claims of only a few rotten apples has apparently ruined rotted and corrupted the whole bunch.


You can't keep treating people, any people, like animals America, and not expect them to at a certain point, start behaving themselves, like beast.


The Dismissals: Who Were Affected?

The firings affected several dedicated FBI agents, many of whom were military veterans with commendable service records. These individuals had invested considerable time and effort into protecting their communities and exemplifying core values of justice and equality. The decision to let them go raised serious concerns about the protection of veterans within federal employment.


For example, one agent had served two tours overseas and expressed that his kneeling was a personal expression of solidarity, not a political statement. Many viewed this distinction as crucial to understanding their motivations and the broader implications of Patel's decision.


Public and Law Enforcement Community Reactions

Reactions to Patel's decision have varied widely. Supporters argue that law enforcement should stay politically neutral, emphasizing that public servants must represent all citizens without bias. Many contend that the firings reflect diminishing tolerance for expressions of solidarity with marginalized communities.


Within the law enforcement community, the dismissals have ignited discussions on the balance between expressing empathy and maintaining professionalism. Some officers reported feeling stifled and worried about losing their jobs for expressing support for social causes. In a recent survey, nearly 60% of officers expressed a desire for greater community engagement, indicating a need for proactive dialogue.


The dismissals have also highlighted a larger issue: the need for law enforcement agencies to connect with the communities they serve. Critics argue that actions like Patel’s only strengthen barriers and deepen mistrust between police forces and the public, complicating future efforts to foster meaningful dialogue.


Legal Implications and Protections for Veterans

Kash Patel's decision carries important legal ramifications, especially concerning veterans' rights. Under federal law, veterans are protected from discrimination and unfair dismissal in the workplace. This protection is crucial in maintaining a fair and equitable environment for those who have served the nation.


Given that many of the dismissed agents were military veterans, there are potential legal avenues available. Experts suggest that they might pursue claims against the FBI, asserting that their firings undermined their rights. A successful case could not only impact the individuals involved but may also establish important precedents for the treatment of veterans in similar situations moving forward.


The Broader Context of Law Enforcement and Social Justice

Patel's actions fit into a larger conversation about how law enforcement interacts with social justice movements. The urgent discussions surrounding police reform, accountability, and community relationships are vital in understanding the effects of such firings.


As society continues to confront issues surrounding systemic racism and police practices, the actions of law enforcement officers—whether supportive of or opposed to social justice initiatives—will undergo extensive scrutiny. The challenge remains in balancing the integrity of law enforcement with genuine concerns from marginalized communities.


Moving Forward

Kash Patel's dismissal of FBI agents who knelt at the George Floyd memorial has sparked crucial debates at the intersection of law enforcement, social justice, and the rights of military veterans. As the United States navigates these complex issues, it is vital to consider the outcomes of such decisions for both the individuals affected and broader societal dynamics.

N ConClusion


Here's the question I think Mr. Patel should ask himself: Is the world you're creating the one you want to raise your children? But more importantly, when you are done destroying the lives of good men who showed only they are human, when there are no more men like these left...


When the only men left are the ones who get excited seeing David Chauvin arrogantly kill a living human being in slow cold blood, will that make us great again?


And what then Mr. Patel, will u do? When all the men who look pretty much exactly like you are gone and it's just U boo? Watcha Gonna Do when they come for you, sir? When you have purged all the bad lines of lineage poisoning the blood of barbaric bullies and there remains left not one brown or black man of your hue, how do you think they will then see, regard and treat, those who are left?


After they scapegoat you for all the ugly hateful racist fascist shit You Will Most Definitely Be Held Accountable 4, What Are You Going To Do Then, When Inevitably They Come For You, Mr. Patel?


Top Stories

bottom of page